Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Gender Inequality in the 1970s Essay -- women, solutions, stereotype, g
There is no upper restriction to the risks men are willing to take in order to succeed, and if in that location is an upper limit for women, they will succeed less. (Clay Shirky, 202) Shirky, the author of A rabbit on about Women argues that women must choke more rapacious and demanding to ultimately accomplish their goals. No matter how society reacts, men take on whatever action, bypassing the Golden Rule to achieve their goals and desires. On the new(prenominal) hand, women lack this function in their search for self-promotion, as Shirky argues. However, in Chisholms speech make up Rights for Women, Chisholm argues that the undeniable causal agency for sexuality in get evenity in the 1970s, was the lack of opportunities women were abandoned in the body of work. Chisholms viewpoint includes the reason women werent treated with equal respect as men, was because women werent given the chance. Both authors battle the reason for gender inequality equally demonstrating how this social problem existed only differentiating on the reasons. In this essay I will argue that Shirkys rank on gender inequality is stronger based on the anecdotes he provides of women maintain themselves to become more successful additionally providing a solution for women to become more aggressive. In the 1970s, when a woman walked into an interview, she was questioned if she bathroom type. This occurs because of the stereotype that women unremarkably occupy the lower standard jobs the less important ones, in other words. The positions women usually occupy include secretaries, librarians, and teachers, because women are viewed as incapable of deny job options such as managers, administrators, doctors, lawyers, and Members of Congress. As Shirley Chisholm declares in her speech, The unspoken assump... ...unately quench exists today. Both Shirky and Chisholm work at publicizing this issue to society, however even out different reasons for why this issue exists. Shirky bel ieves women are not as aggressive in demanding self-promotion as well as equality, while Shirley believes the root of gender inequality is the low amount of opportunities women are given in the workplace in comparison to men. While I consider Shirkys line of reasoning stronger, I still agree with Chisholms argument based gain of the job position evidence she provides. Based off both articles, women choose to become more arrogant and selfish to rightfully demand what is theirs, no matter what the consequence. Men can do it, so why cant women? Works CitedChisholm, Shirley. Equal Rights for Women. Washington D.C., May 21, 1969Shirky, Clay. A rave about Women. Shirky.com. Clay Shirky Blog, January 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment