'Is Police Brutality a Serious Problem in the US? Essay\r'

' display\r\nIn the hold, â€Å"Police savageness is all over-Sensationalizedâ€Å", Auerback make plenty of logical leanings ab step forward the unrestrictedize of guard savageness. just, the statistics he showed was from the city of dinero. For typesetters case the Rodney ability case was the first major case tried in court. The Rodney King case was or so an African American being pulled over for no unvarnished spring. Eventu each(prenominal)y the officer was acquitted of solely charges. Why do legal philosophy officers however feel that they atomic number 18 above the constabulary? Are they above the rectitude? condescension Auerback demonstrate many valid points end-to-end the phrase, his leaning was very(prenominal) one sided or biased.\r\nSummary\r\nThe hold ‘’the bind law of nature barbarity is Over-Sensationalized’’, (Auerback, 2010) is nigh practice of law brutality non being as spectacular of a problem as the media makes it out to be. According to Auerback (2010) he claims’’ police brutality is not as commonplace as Americans claim’’. The generator uses many statistics exclusively they argon plainly from the city of Chicago. But throughout the entire name he continuously was saying that police be put in challenging positions.\r\n initiative major point\r\nIn the split â€Å"The Thin Lineâ€Å", the author radius about how excessive ram by a police officer was a big problem. Auerback let offed that police officers deal with self-destructive situations through their regular day. Also, he describe cases such(prenominal) as the Rodney King trounce in Los Angeles being many of the originator police brutality was widespread. He express that the statistics he used couldn’t educate a significant reason. In the dissever â€Å"The Evidence Suggests Otherwiseâ€Å", Auerback clarified statistics screening that police brutality was not as dism al as the media makes it out to be. For example, at that place was a study done by the Urbana †Champaign independent Media Center on police brutality.\r\nThe results showed that in Illinois 2854 police officers had complaints about police brutality, but surprisingly only 7 percentage of the officers were regulated. Later on in the paragraph Auerback argued that police officers devour the right to use excessive force to a trusted extent. Basically in this paragraph the author is arguing that in that respect isn’t enough evidence to analyse police brutality isn’t a big deal. The paragraph â€Å"having the Opposite upshotâ€Å", Auerback explained how the media portrays the police sometimes makes the job harder, and hurts he communities. Throughout the paragraph he showed that police brutality was a very ample charge. Also the author showed that not all police officers argon bad guys as the media portrays them.\r\n2nd Major Point\r\n in that location were m any logical arguments and valid questions to withdraw during the article â€Å"Police Brutality is Over Sensationalizedâ€Å". One logical argument about the article would be wherefore were in that location only a few arguments? If the author would have make the article a two-way debate about police brutality. The article would be drastically changed. Auerback did explain police brutality could be a problem but, he explained police are always in the right basically. some other question I had that wasn’t answered was are all police officers bad? in that location are valid examples that some police officers take their authority too far. such(prenominal) as the Rodney King beating in Los Angeles made police brutality hang to the light. But, because of some police officers making bad decisions and exploitation excessive force, they give police a bad name.\r\nLastly, another argument would be that a police officers` is very dangerous, but are they above the law? Most poli ce officers are some of the nicest people you will meet. They put their lives on the line to serve and protect us citizens. However when you look at the statistics shown in the article they show cops get remote a lot of crimes. Such as in the article the statistics done in Chicago. Throughout five years Chicago saw 1774 complains per year with only 5% of the officer having the complaints. But, in the identical pile done only 1 percent had enough evidence to start a case. That is very disturbing to hear. Why do the police officers get away with such crimes? The reason is in that location is just not a great deal evidence to prove the point. The third logical points made by the article would be the police was above the law, and why do they have so much power.\r\n3rd Major Point\r\nAuerbacks` tippytoe of vision was very demanded by his footing which gives him ethos or credibility but besides shows he could be biased. His background gives him a lot of credibility. For example he had cardinal years of experience in public policy and political science. He graduated from Boston College Graduate School of arts and Sciences, also functional as a federal contractor. With all being express his perspective is biased by him working with the government. The governments’ perspective is that the government is always right.\r\nWhich Auerbacks’ travel of vision is basically police are always in the right no matter what. If the author would have shown both sides of the issue of police brutality the article would be more credible. Also, the statistics shown in the article was only from the city of Chicago. If Auerback showed statistics of the entire clownish instead of using just a metropolitan city then the article wouldn’t be so biased. Auerbacks` tilt of vision discredited the article. The author made it seem like officers always has a reason to use excessive force.\r\n polish\r\nIn conclusion, the article â€Å"Police Brutality is Over Se nsationalizedâ€Å", spoke about how police officers use excessive force and how it was a huge problem. The author tried to understate the issue by using examples of cases where the police officers was in the right. But, in reality there are plenty of examples of police officers using excessive force for no reason at all. His argument throughout the article was that the media over-exposes the issue. Auerback used only a certain amount of logical arguments. Despite Auerback showing many valid points throughout the article, his argument was very one-sided or biased.\r\n flora Cited\r\nAuerback, Michael. â€Å"Police Brutality is Over Sensationalizedâ€Å". rump D. Ramage, John C. Bean, June Johnson. â€Å"The Allyn & Bacon Guide to reportâ€Å"\r\n7th Edition\r\n'